What is the object of time or place (maf'ul fihi / zarf)?
In one line
Classical definition
Understand it
English says in the morning, behind the house. Arabic often needs no preposition at all: the ism itself carries the “in”, and takes nasab to show it.
سَافَرْتُ صَبَاحًا (safartu sabahan), I travelled in the morning. جَلَسْتُ أَمَامَ الْبَابِ (jalastu amama al-babi), I sat in front of the door.
The five mafa'il
Five roles share the word مَفْعُول, and each answers a different question about the action: what it fell upon, how much of it there was, why it happened, who it happened alongside, and when or where.
It comes in two kinds — ظَرْف زَمَان (zarf zaman), of time, and ظَرْف مَكَان (zarf makan), of place.
The two kinds, with the commonest of each
| Kind | Meaning | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| of time | صَبَاحًا | sabahan | in the morning |
| لَيْلًا | laylan | at night | |
| يَوْمَ | yawma | on the day of | |
| حِينَ | hina | at the time when | |
| of place | أَمَامَ | amama | in front of |
| خَلْفَ | khalfa | behind | |
| فَوْقَ | fawqa | above | |
| تَحْتَ | tahta | below | |
| عِنْدَ | 'inda | at — in the presence of |
Every one of them answers when? or where? — and every one of them is mansub. The test the books give is finer than that: the word must carry the meaning of فِي, in. A word of time or place that does not carry it is not a zarf at all, and is parsed by whatever role it is actually filling.1
The condition is the buried “in”. A word of time or place that does not carry that meaning is not a zarf at all — it is parsed by whatever role it is actually filling. الْيَوْمُ جَمِيلٌ (al-yawmu jamilun), the day is beautiful: يَوْم here is the mubtada', marfu', not a zarf.
How to spot it
In the Qur'an
When a time-word is not a zarf
Not every word of time or place is a zarf.
The test is the hidden فِي. If you can read the word as “in that time” or “in that place”, it is a zarf and takes nasab.
If you cannot, the word is simply doing some other job and takes whatever i'rab that job requires — الْيَوْمُ جَمِيلٌ, where يَوْم is the mubtada' and marfu'.
And when a real preposition is written in front of it — فِي الصَّبَاحِ — the word is majrur after the harf jarr, not mansub as a zarf.
Related terms
Common questions
What makes a zarf different from a prepositional phrase of time?
The absence of the preposition. A zarf carries the sense of in by itself and takes nasab. Put a preposition in front of the same word and it becomes majrur instead — the meaning survives, the grammar changes.
Next in the guideاَلْحَالWhat is the circumstance (hal)? →Notes
- The definition — an ism in nasab indicating the time or place of the action while containing the meaning of فِي — is اَلنَّحْو التَّطْبِيقِي's (an-Nahw at-Tatbiqi). ↩
Updated